Frederick Shaddock & Oksana Shemet Shaddock
10 divorce proceedings for over 20 years

Videos of Oksana's threats to make a False Police Report

Proposed Distribution of Assets

Frederick's proposal below:

Oksana (56)	Frederick (69)
Luxury condo on Water Front 520 N Street SW, Suite S316 Washington, DC 20024 www.Harbour-Square.com/S316 $253,900 according to Zillow Frederick purchased N32 in 2001, then sold it in 2009 Frederick wants Equal Rights at DC Condo from Manager	Family sized house - 4 bedrooms 806 North 4th Street Fairfield, IA  52556 www.FairfieldIowaHouse.com $122,900 according to Jefferson County Assessor PDF Oksana comes without notice and bosses Frederick and tenants ruining friendships with fertile, potential next wives
Mercedes Benz C230, 2001	Mercedes Benz 190E, 1989 (old)
Oksana has her credit cards to pay	Frederick has his credit cards to pay
No other debts or loans	No other debts or loans
No children	1 son from another marriage, now 17 in Sweden
Crypto: unknown amount	Crypto: unknown amount
Enjoys city life, cultural events, and shopping	Enjoys simple, inexpensive life and group meditation at MIU Dome.
Computer graphics consultant	Retired on Social Security and AirBnb revenue

Oksana's (ridiculous) proposal

Reason for Divorce

Sadly, Frederick and Oksana had no children to perpetuate their high IQ DNA.  They were married in Arlington Virginia, near DC in 2001 and lived in a 1 bedroom condo.  In 2006, Frederick realized there was no room for kids and bought a family sized house in Fairfield Iowa in August 2006.  He repeatedly invited Oksana to move from DC to Iowa, but she refused and insisted on living mostly in DC.  Since then, they have lived 1000 miles from each other for over 1/2 the time on average, which is not good for emotional or physical health.

Frederick has the perfect family house, across the street from award winning Maharishi Children's School.  He has no son to inherit his Y chromosome, computer business and house.  He has a son from another marriage, who lives in Sweden, with no interest in living in Fairfield with Oksana around. Oksana harassed his mother Marie Tobiasson away in 2007.  Oksana continues to separate Frederick from his son Lukas by threats to arrest him if he comes to Fairfield.

The purpose of marriage is to keep a man and woman, who have naturally selected each other for beneficial traits for the human species, together long enough to create and develop self-sufficient offspring with their DNA, who hopefully create further improved grand children. Marriage is part of the Natural Selection process in human evolution that brought us from apes to modern homo sapiens.

Oksana said nasty things, even last night (June 16, 2024): "I hope you die alone of a heart attack."  and "I'll call the Police on you."  This is just unsustainable.  It is wrong for 2 such people to be forced into the same house for months.  It is nearly non-stop stress for everyone.

Oksana is a beautiful, intelligent, and talented lady with a luxury condo in Washington DC, with security clearance to do many US government jobs. It is a sad loss for the human species that she is now past her child bearing years.  She is very dedicated, loving, and faithful in marriage. She likes the Kennedy Center and Embassy events and can surely attract a rich new husband.  Frederick just gets by on Social Security and renters.  Oksana deserves a more compatible, richer husband who can make the rest of her life happier.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrbPAt1_vc4

Agreement Proposal
as of 06/11/2026

Abstract / Summary:

This proposed divorce agreement includes a generous 50% - 50% split of the Washington DC condo value, which would accomplish Oksana's goal of releasing her from Iowa house mortgage.
The previous offer is off the table: Oksana can keep 100% of the condo, and allow Frederick to continue paying the house mortgage, with a guarantee to pay on time and cause no bad credit report.
Frederick had proposed that neither he nor Oksana try to force the sale of the other's preferred marital property, to preserve the status quo.  But Oksana's behavior ruined her chances for that deal.

Oksana has caused Frederick financial hardship by insisting to stay in rooms he was renting to Miss J, Miss A, and Miss M, who were helping Frederick to pay the Chase mortgage of $400 +taxes + insurance = $861/month.  Oksana refuses to help pay the mortgage, and even utilities.  She runs the air conditioner full time, causing high electricity costs.  She waters plants in the back yard, causing a high water bill.  As a result, Frederick has had to pay credit cards late, causing his FICO score to decrease.  This makes it harder for Frederick to qualify for a Mortgage Assumption on his own.  Oksana has thus made it harder to achieve her objective of getting her name off the Iowa house Chase mortgage.  Chase is sending an application for Assumption, and says the process can take 180 days (6 months) to complete and a $900 fee. 

Refinancing under Frederick's name is an impossibility, due to his FICO score, and the high mortgage interest rates.  Frederick is 17 years into the 30 year mortgage period (57%).  Frederick would have to start the Mortgage Curve back at "Square 1" when 99% of the mortgage payment goes only towards interest, not the principal, paying for 30 years until he is 98 years old.

Frederick initially offered to not seek a penny from the marital Washington DC condo, and to guarantee to Oksana that he would continue paying the mortgage on time, giving her an excellent credit rating report until it is paid off.  Frederick stipulated that if the mortgage fell 6 months behind, then Oksana could force the sale of the 806 North 4th Street, Fairfield Iowa house. But this generous offer was not good enough for her.

Oksana wants to force Frederick to sell the Iowa house, which could take years.  The house next door at 808 North 4th took the owners 3 years to sell.  But Frederick can also ask the Judge to force the sale of the Washington DC condo, which would likely sell within days.  Two can play hard ball.  The husband and wife have equal rights to demand 1/2 the marital equity.  Fair is fair.  

Forced house sales are impractical.  Both parties have to agree to sell a home.  Frederick flatly refuses to sell the Iowa house and could make it difficult for a real estate agent to sell a property.  He could make a mess of the kitchen, tell potential buyers about bats in the attic, or whatever.  A large barking dog could keep people away.  Likewise, Oksana could refuse to let prospective buyers into the condo by simply telling the Security Guard that she wants no visitors. Real estate agents do not have the right to go into a property uninvited, much less potential buyers. 

The husband or wife who has the most valuable asset is the one who would have to be forced to sell, if anyone to even the financial score.  Clearly Oksana would get the most expensive asset, the Washington DC luxury condo.  Even though Frederick helped pay the mortgage on the DC condo via CashApp for an average of $30/day or $900/month in 2017-2018. Oksana has not helped pay for the Iowa house, and with frequent asking, only for utilities she used.

There is a stronger argument for selling the DC condo because it's equity is worth 5.5 times more than the Iowa house's.  Oksana thus would be on the losing side of a "Real Estate Sale Force Battle" because her preferred DC condo ($253900 equity) is worth over twice as much as Frederick's preferred Iowa house ($122900 minus $76760.85 Chase Mortgage pay off = $46139.15 equity).

Frederick could legally demand an equal 50% of the proceeds from selling the Washington DC condo. 
If Oksana sells DC condo for $253900, then she splits the profit with Rick 50% = $126500 for each.
Frederick can then pay off Chase Mortgage principal + Covid Deferment due on house of $76760.85 ,and still have $50,189.15 in cash left.
Frederick was willing to be nice, to agree to only a 70% - 30% split, just enough to pay off the Iowa house mortgage, and Fred pays $590.85.
which achieves Oksana's stated goal of being completely off of the paid off Iowa house mortgage.
But Oksana inteitionally ruined Fred's relationships with women by creating "drama" which could take years to overcome.

FrederickOksanaDivorce..xls or https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets

Oksana may wish to sell, and use her remaining cash of $177,730 to buy a town house near DC. She has found that the Harbour Square Condo Owners Association Board of Directors has too much ownership and control.  They have prohibited short term rentals (less than 6 months), making it impossible for her to rent to someone while traveling.  "Owners" will not even be able to rent their condos during the upcoming Trump Inauguration.  So the luxury condo sits gathering dust, and bills for her of $1200/month. 

Frederick likes the Iowa house and Oksana likes the DC condo.   Frederick and Oksana agreed that he takes care of all Iowa house expenses, and Oksana takes care of all DC condo expenses.  Although Frederick made the initial purchase at Harbour Square in 2001, he moved to Iowa in 2006 and bought the Iowa house.  Oksana is the one who has maintained the DC condo since then.  Frederick maintained the Iowa house.  Each spouse has had equal rights to stay at one or the other place during marriage.  After divorce, each spouse would need permission from the other spouse to stay at his or her residence.

Frederick could possibly agree to a 70% - $30% split of the Washington DC condo,
basically giving her $50,780 which is 20% of his 50% share of the condo sale proceeds, and just simply paying off the Iowa house mortgage with the 30%.

Actually, if Oksana agreed to help pay off the Iowa house mortgage, as many wives would do, Frederick would agree she could stay at the house rent free, only paying 1/2 of the taxes, insurance, and utilities (water, gas, electric, internet) - about $400/month with no renters.  Or, if she allowed renter(s), then she could get the income from them  to pay her $400 contribution for house expenses.  She would still have $177,730 cash to retire on, not have to work, and do with as she pleases, including growing a garden, with no claim by Frederick that it is marital asset.   She would no longer have the financial pressure of paying $1200/month for he DC condo.  She may wish to use the money from the condo sale for adoption or surrogacy, solving Frederick's main objection with the otherwise childless marriage, and focus on growing children.  She could still stay on the Deed, if she chooses.

If President Trump fires unnecessary US Government employees, then the DC real estate market will decrease.  Laid off employees will sell their homes causing a Buyer's Market.   With Biden's allowing terrorists to flood across the southern US border, terror attacks on DC are more likely, making DC a dangerous place to own property.  Mass Deportation of illegal invaders will spark violent protests in DC.  So it may be high time for Oksana to agree to sell the DC condo.  The #1 problem of marriages, financial pressure, would be solved, leading to a happier marriage.

Or, Oksana can keep 100% of the condo, and allow Frederick to continue paying the house mortgage, with a guarantee to pay on time and cause no bad credit report.  In the event of another China Virus catastrophe, Chase Mortgage may offer another payment deferment, which will not negatively impact Frederick or Oksana's credit report.  Frederick does not anticipate going even 1 month late, to save his own credit rating, but would like to ask for a maximum of 6 months late to be on the safe side in case of illness, before sale of the Iowa house is forced.

Frederick proposes that neither he nor Oksana try to force the sale of either's likely-awarded marital property, which would upset the status quo, and cause great stress.

Chronology