COMES NOW  Petitioner Frederick J. Shaddock, pro se, and respectfully moves this Court for clarification of the March 3, 2026 Order regarding the status quo and interim rights to marital property pending final resolution by a divorce judge.

1. The March 3, 2026 Order denied Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss and granted Respondent's Motion for Continuance, but did not address interim access to or use of marital property.  A crucial point was not addressed.  Until a Court orders division of property, the default is that the property remains marital with both parties having equal rights to access.

2. Petitioner seeks clarification on the following points to avoid further confusion or irreparable physical harm leading to earlier death:
    

   • Has a de-facto Division Of Property just been authorized prior to a final, de-jure divorce hearing?

   • Does the dismissal of the Motion to declare martial property as equally owned establish a new legal precedent for all married couples in Iowa?

   • Does the Order authorize Respondent to perform extra-judicial lock-outs, change locks on, or otherwise deny Petitioner access to, the marital residence in Fairfield, Iowa?

   • Does the Order authorize Respondent to deactivate Petitioner's key fob access to the marital condominium in Washington, D.C. (Unit S-316), including elevators, gym, pool, and outside grounds in fresh air - unlawful confinement? 

   • Does the order permit continued intentional infliction of a 70 year old's physical and emotional suffering, inability to do doctor-ordered exercise, hastening health problems?

   • Does the Order grant immunity from prosecution and authorize Respondent to intentionally interfere with Petitioner's receipt of U.S. mail at the marital D.C. condominium and conceal mail delivered to the marital Iowa house?  Does the Order supercede Federal Law - the misdemeanor of violating U.S. Code Section § 1701?

   • Does the Order grant immunity and authorize Respondent to extort, threaten to, or actually contact law enforcement to accuse Petitioner of trespassing on marital property?   
     Iowa Code 711.4 "A person commits extortion if the person does any of the following"
     b. Threatens to (falsely) accuse another of a public offense.
     
      

   • Respondent called the Washington DC Police two times (Central Complaint Numbers #25139139 and #25163569) and accused Petitioner of "trespassing" on her exclusive property.  Five (5) DC Police responded, checked Petitioner's ID, drivers licenses, voter registration card, and IRS tax returns, and determined that he has full rights to reside at the marital condo, and refused to make an arrest.  

   • Nebulous orders that do not state the obvious - that marital property is equally owned - encourage such behavior.  A clear order about marital property is necessary to prevent such abuse of the Law Enforcement system, which Respondent has done 30 times:  http://911FakeCalls.com

3. Clarification is necessary to correct the status quo, prevent further interference with marital property, and avoid unnecessary litigation or enforcement actions while the case is pending.  A status hearing or status conference can clarify address matters not resolved by the March 3, 2026 ruling.

WHEREFORE, Petitioner requests:

1. An order clarifying the March 3, 2026 ruling as to the above points.
2. A clear, unambiguous declaration that property purchased during the marriage is marital property with equal access rights by both spouses.
3. A status hearing to address the open-wound issues that caused this 10th divorce proceeding.
4. Such other relief as the Court deems just and equitable.

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Frederick J. Shaddock
Frederick J. Shaddock, Pro Se
806 North 4th Street, Fairfield, IA  52556
520 N St SW, Unit S-316 , Washington, DC 20024
(641) 819-8006 and (202) 365-6100
fred@shaddock.net

Date: March 4, 2026

Certificate of Service

I certify that on March 4, 2026, a true copy was served by email to:
Joe Pavelich (pavelich@spiespavelich.com)
Oksana Shaddock (oksanashaddock@gmail.com)
Robert C. Liotta (rcl@ldelaw.com) /s/ Frederick J. Shaddock